Responsibility Measures
Shared responsibility
Aquaculture should not be singled out as industry, instead cooperation in handling waste with other
industries/neighbour states is needed. This would make the logistics for handling wastes more attractive for specialized
companies.
Implement the new EPR provisions related to fishing and aquaculture gear according to Art. 8 of the SUPD into national
law for prevention and better design/and expand individual responsibilities, by including indirect costs like littering
or climate change for single-use products. This could be also achieved by the general fee of 20 cent for all typical
single-use plastic packages used in the aquaculture sector.
National legislation needs to refer to the items mentioned in the SUPD which are also used in the aquaculture sector
like caps and plastic bags - but should extend the range of items and include other SUP items, specifically used in this
sector like cords, gloves, boxes and special packaging. With the revenues, avoidance and multi-use concepts have to be
fostered.
EPR schemes can also support the better design of unavoidable single-use plastic products to improve their recycling
capability. Obligatory quota for recyclates to increase secondary raw materials that can be used to make high-quality
new products.
Within EPR schemes supporting the better design, companies could pay a fee to the national / municipal responsible
authority, which could be used to remove marine litter in general or with a focus on the small litter items.
Support individual EPR schemes since in practice producers and manufacturers often transfer their responsibility to
producer responsibility organisations (PROs).
If a collective scheme is chosen on national level, the PRO, set up by producers or through legislation, has to be
regularly (e.g. every 5 years) assessed whether they have met their responsibility for recovery and recycling
obligations of the individual producers.